<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Common Business Challenges</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.nomorepencils.com/2009/06/common-business-challenges/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.nomorepencils.com/2009/06/common-business-challenges/</link>
	<description>there is no dust on the internet</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 07 Jun 2010 20:50:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Bennett</title>
		<link>http://www.nomorepencils.com/2009/06/common-business-challenges/comment-page-1/#comment-353</link>
		<dc:creator>David Bennett</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Jun 2009 09:03:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nomorepencils.com/?p=717#comment-353</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t think I can give a definitive answer on what is the most effective method in the longer-term but su.pr from Stumbleupon has brought in a lot of traffic.

I think that being quick off the mark with new tools is important. 

I don&#039;t think that simply using everything that is available, without any discrimination, is a good policy.

I do think though that using everything that seem worthwhile is a good policy. 

Obviously, I am talking about free avenues to bringing in visitors. For paid advertising the picture is governed by cost and return on investment in a much more clear-cut way.

For free avenues, the only downsides are time spent on developing them and the time and opportunity missed developing a better avenue.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t think I can give a definitive answer on what is the most effective method in the longer-term but su.pr from Stumbleupon has brought in a lot of traffic.</p>
<p>I think that being quick off the mark with new tools is important. </p>
<p>I don&#8217;t think that simply using everything that is available, without any discrimination, is a good policy.</p>
<p>I do think though that using everything that seem worthwhile is a good policy. </p>
<p>Obviously, I am talking about free avenues to bringing in visitors. For paid advertising the picture is governed by cost and return on investment in a much more clear-cut way.</p>
<p>For free avenues, the only downsides are time spent on developing them and the time and opportunity missed developing a better avenue.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Emily Cagle</title>
		<link>http://www.nomorepencils.com/2009/06/common-business-challenges/comment-page-1/#comment-352</link>
		<dc:creator>Emily Cagle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Jun 2009 08:38:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nomorepencils.com/?p=717#comment-352</guid>
		<description>These are indeed very common challenges for online businesses and I agree that long term commitment, perseverance and reflection are all vital.

What have you found to be the most effective method for drawing the right traffic to your site? Or do you find that it&#039;s how you combine your efforts that makes them effective?

Emily</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>These are indeed very common challenges for online businesses and I agree that long term commitment, perseverance and reflection are all vital.</p>
<p>What have you found to be the most effective method for drawing the right traffic to your site? Or do you find that it&#8217;s how you combine your efforts that makes them effective?</p>
<p>Emily</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
