The Killing – Danish Version

After a few weeks of watching The Killing four times a week, I am starting to hear the cadence and accent of Danish in my head.

I bet I could start speaking Danish in a few weeks. It has some similarities with Dutch, which I know a bit, and I have got over the fear I had when I first started listening to Danish and saw from the subtitles that the names of people were pronounced very differently from how they are written.

I wonder whether Vagn is the Danish version of Vaughn?

How to pronounce Søren Kierkegaard

Some years ago in Copenhagen I was at the Søren Kierkegaard House. I asked the man at the door how Søren Kierkegaard’s name was pronounced.

I noticed that the ‘r’ in Søren was almost buried, so that it sounded to my ear like ‘sahn’.

Troels Hartmann

Well now, courtesy of Google Translate’s ‘Listen’ feature – I can hear it pronounced. But I am not convinced of the accuracy, because when I put in Troels Hartmann (whose first name is pronounced Trools in The Killing, it sounds more like Trolls.

Vagn

And Vagn’s name in Google Translate sounds like Vern.

And Danish speakers out there?

Potiche

In the ‘foreign films described as being brim full of clever writing and with a notable cast’ ranks, one film has stood out recently.

It is Potiche (The Trophy Wife) starring Catherine Deneuve and Gérard Depardieu.

It is set in 1977 in a small town where there is an umbrella factory.

I don’t know what I was expecting – something sublime and yet gutsy, perhaps.

I may have enjoyed it more without the build-up, because I found myself measuring it up to its hype for quite a while before I settled down and enjoyed it just for what it was.

It was enjoyable and it had its moments, but it was not sublime.

It is quite a slight film really – almost a farce, in that intellectual French way that makes me think of the theatre rather than of a film.

The best bits were when Gérard Depardieu showed his feelings. He seemed to reach out human being to human being.

Catherine Deneuve played the trophy wife who comes down off the shelf and proves she is more than a match for any neanderthal man in her way. She does it with charm and resilience. But she is really quite tired and world weary underneath.

And she has a past. All in all she is just ‘accomplished’ – but she didn’t move me.

Would I write about Potiche if it had not been hailed by critics as a very, very good film?

Maybe I should set my calendar to remind me in a year’s time to think about the film and see how much of an impression it has left on me.

When Sean Connery Was No Longer My Hero

Sean Connery as James Bond

He was great in Dr No but the plot was a bit too unreal for my taste – especially at the end with the reactor on the island blowing up.

Then he did From Russia With Love and that had a real believable plot. I think everyone thinks that that was the high point of the Bond series.

The point at which Sean Connery broke the spell for me was in Goldfinger.

The exact point where we parted company was when he called out to Pussy Galore, the pilot who worked for Goldfinger but changed sides and came over to side of law and order.

Sean Connery has a lovely Scottish brogue accent. But it does not go well with the word pussy.

“Poosy…”, he called to her – and for me the spell was broken and I squirmed and then laughed in my seat.

I Love American Film Credits

I love American film credits.

Watching them and seeing the names of the technical people roll by – from the camera boom operator to the hair stylist for the leading man – reminds me of ‘bring me your huddled masses’.

There are names from all over the world – Chinese sounding names, Hungarian sounding names, Spanish sounding names. They are all there.

Things I Learned Today – Frank Stallone – Charles Bukowski – Mickey Rourke – Barfly

Frank P. Stallone, Jr. is an American film actor, singer, guitarist, Golden Globe and Grammy Award-nominated songwriter, amateur boxer, and the brother of Sylvester Stallone.

He played the character ‘Eddie’ in the film Barfly, which starred Mickey Rourke as the character ‘Henry Chinaski’. Eddie owns the bar and Henry drinks there.

Barfly, made in 1987, is the semi-autobiographical story of the hard-drinking years of poet and author Charles Bukowski who is said to have spent his evenings fighting the owner of the bar.

As the characters Henry and Eddie, Mickey Rourke and Frank Stallone use their boxing skills in the film, slugging it out repeatedly in the alley behind the bar.

Bukowski wrote a letter that is reproduced on the website ‘Letters of Note’ that is entitled letter from a fan, praising Mickey Rourke’s acting and saying how it was heaven for he (Bukowski) as the writer to be given the last word on any changes in the dialogue. Click the link to read it – it is well worth reading.

Here is a link to information about the film Barfly – from WikiPedia and from IMDb.

The intro from IMDb reads:

Henry Chinaski never cared for the American dream, the thought of needing to become ‘something’ and fit into the system disgusts him. He believes that life is free and yours to live like you see fit, and if that in some cases involves…

I’ll watch out for it – it may make Film 4 on TV sometime or other.

Update April 2011
By chance, the author of a website dedicated to the quotable comments of Charles Bukowski commented on one of my photos over at Photograph Works. That prompted me to take a look at the site and from there to read more about Charles Bukowski.

I realise now that this article, which concentrates on the thread that had led me to the information here, gives short shrift to the man who was the inspiration for it all.

You can read more about Charles Bukowski in this Wikipedia entry. I recommend it if you have an ear for the poetry in phrases.

A Serious Man – Being A Fool When Everyone Is Smart

I was thinking about the film A Serious Man, made by the Coen brothers. The film is unusual because it ‘begins’ with a short film shot in sepia about a poor Jewish couple in nineteenth century Russia who are visited by a dybbuk (a malicious spirit) that has inhabited the body of a recently deceased rabbi.

The wife is fearful and practical. The husband is ambivalent and hesitant. There is not much of a story but the thread that runs through it is that the wife is certain that she and her husband will be visited by more bad luck.

Then we segue into the main film – A Serious Man – about a man who watches his life fall apart around him. Set in the present day, the main protagonist is a lecturer at a college somewhere on the East Coast of the U.S. – an intelligent man with a responsible job.

His wife is leaving with another man and doing it right under his nose. His daughter ignores and derides him. His son, who is soon to be bar-mitzvah’d, seems to be in a world of his own. His boss at work is enigmatic and disconcerting. His wife’s new boyfriend patronises him.

In the middle of all of this one of his students tries to bribe him to change his grade on a paper.

Near the end of the film, and after saying no, no, no – the serious man decides to take the bribe.

And immediately the phone rings and it is his doctor saying he should come in right away to discuss the results of his latest tests.

There – the reward for his sin of accepting the bribe is that his life immediately changes for the worse and he will probably die.

Why Do Bad Things Happen To Good People
He is basically a good man. He has a moral conscience. He tries to do right. For whatever reasons due to pressures on him, he falters and does something he knows he should not.

You can see that he almost takes the bribe out of desperation to be seen and heard. Somehow it is payback time for the anguish he is feeling because everyone around him seems to be taking no notice of him.

It is almost like he joined the human race.

And this is his reward! That he should be struck down with a serious illness, perhaps die!

How can this be fair? When there are people who do much worse things and don’t suffer any consequences. They even prosper.

The Way To

The Way To

The Answer According To
The protagonist in A Serious Man is Jewish, so it seems right and fitting to examine the question from the point of view of the touchstone of his beliefs.

There is a thread in the Jewish tradition that teaches that the inclination to do evil is a strange beast. For a man who does what he wants without a thought as to whether it is right or wrong, the inclination to do evil has no work to do and so it becomes fat, lazy, and weak.

But with a man who is striving to do good, the inclination to do evil is really stretched. It is in tip-top condition, so it waits for its moment, and then it slips in and does its work.

And the nearer that a man gets to being a good man, the finer the balance and the greater the consequences for doing a bad thing.

Moreover, the nearer a man is to being a good man, the more that a small bad thing will bring about serious consequences.

Whereas that same bad thing if done by a bad man will not bring about serious consequences or perhaps even any consequences at all.

Whether this is all true of course, is another question, but we can at least accept that there is logic in the system of thought that holds it together. It is not crazy and illogical, at least.

And The Lesson From This Is?
So, accepting for the moment the truth of the system that says there is a an evil inclination and a sliding scale of consequences depending on whether someone is striving to be a good person or not – who is doling out the consequences?

And the answer in the Jewish tradition is that it is of course God who is doing this.

It is obvious that there has to be more to the Judaic system than just this ‘inclination-and-consequences’ part – otherwise the lesson to learn from this is that it is better to be a bad man.

‘Be really bad and get away with just about anything – and with no serious consequences.’

Wow – that’s the way to go!

Before going any further I should say that according to the tradition, a man has an inclination to do good, as well – so there is always a contest going on between the two inclinations.

Be that as it may, what is the heart of the question of why bad things happen to good people?

The Right Question
The answer is, I think that it is not the right question. Of course, we are interested in why bad things happen to good people, but tell me if this isn’t true? What we really want to know is why bad things don’t happen to bad people?

This is really the question that everyone wants an answer to and it is really the question that The Serious Man is asking when he looks around and sees everyone being smart and gaming the system and getting ahead.

And that is really the test – whether one can be a fool when everyone around you is being smart.