What Should The Last Man Standing Do

What should the last man standing do?

Picture the last man (or woman – this is a gender-neutral article) who believes in a particular religion.

It could be any religion, well-known or not. I am not picking on any religion and in fact to set the scene I am widening the meaning of religion to take in anything that asks for adherance.

For example, it could be a young man in a city who is part of a gang.

And now picture this scenario: All the other gang members are bumped off in a showdown with a rival gang. In fact, all the members of both gangs are killed in that final bloody shootout – except for our guy.

So now the last, lone gang member is without a gang. There is not a gang to which he can attach himself. What does he do? What does he do with the gang paraphernalia that he has been wearing and the gang rituals and the way he speaks to show he is a member of the gang? Is it meaningless now?

Does he go on doing the things that the gang members did?

Probably he would feel a bit silly. Maybe he would look for the next nearest gang to attach to.

Widen This Picture

OK. you get the idea. There is something faintly ridiculous about this man showing adherence to something that no longer exists.

When the man is taken out of his surroundings and comes up against the hard edge of a different reality, we see how deep his sense of self runs.

There have been several films that explored this. Sometimes the character is sympathetic, has a relatively gentle epiphany and grows spiritually. Sometimes the character is a pain in the behind and gets his comeuppance in a messy showdown.

Back To Classic Religions

But I am interested in the man who is the last member of his religion. And here I mean religion in the classical sense of having a relationship with an immanent, transcendent God.

After all, there may be a God but who is to say that he/she/it is the Hindu God, or the Jewish God, or the Christian God, or the Muslim God, or some other un-named God.

So when all but the last adherent of a faith has died, what does the last man standing do? Does he say – ‘Forget this for a game of marbles; I’m going home’ or does he pray?

What should the last man standing do? I guess that is when we see how deep his faith runs.

Why God Made The World

I’ve been working my way through the xml file I downloaded when I cleared out this site last year. Today, a friend’s post on Facebook prompted me to find this post in the xml file and republish it.

When anyone thinks about whether there is a God, I think they have to consider how the notion of God answers the question of why the world exists.

I once thought about the likelihood of there being a God and I imagined everything as one thing – that is, I put everything in the universe from the smallest thing to the largest objects I could imagine in one bundle and then I thought of it all as one thing.

And I asked myself whether on a balance of probabilities it was more likely that this ‘everything’ simply existed – just of itself – or was it more likely that there was an intelligent purpose behind it and that God existed.

I thought it more likely that there is a God, because it seemed less likely than that everything simply ‘was’.

In fact it seemed a bit of a nonsense to imagine that everything just ‘was’.

But I leave room for that possibility, and perhaps we are just the growing tip of the universe, as it were, to borrow a phrase from the biology of plants and trees.

Noah After The Flood

To think about why things are as they are, there is a chapter in the Old Testament about what happens after the flood. And that chapter seems, perhaps, to talk about the nature of reality.

The story goes that Noah is berating himself for having not really believed there would be a flood. He tells himself that if he had truly believed then he would have made a better job of convincing people the flood was coming. And he would, therefore, have saved more people.

Full of guilt and self-pity, he becomes a drunkard – a shell of a man. One of his sons finds him passed out dead drunk and ridicules him for what he has become.

Then his sons are sitting talking about what the future will hold, and God talks to them. God tells them that if they set up the institutions of social justice and social care he will come down and erect a tent around them and come and dwell in the tent.

I like the idea of God coming down into the world. The world is all we know – the rest we have to imagine or intuit.

I can see the attraction of a protective tent to keep me warm, rather than that I think I am spinning on a ball in cold, dead outer space.

The concept that interests me and that I think speaks about the nature of reality is the idea that God can come into the world or remain out of it.

It is an interesting concept bearing in mind that if God is everything and made everything, then it is a neat trick for him to be able to ‘not be’ in part of that which he is.

Well that’s the story and it could be poppycock – but it holds together as a thought. Or rather it raises a question – which is why does the world exist at all?

Why The World Was Formed

As I said, when anyone thinks about whether there is a God, I think they have to consider how the notion of God answers the question of why the world exists.

Judaism has an answer for this. Other religions may also have an answer to this question, but Judaism does and it begins with the notion that God is the very definition of good.

That being so, he wants to do good because it is the natural outpouring of his goodness.

And the ultimate good he can do is to give his creative power to someone else.

But there is only God. So he withdraws and makes a space – a place where he is not.

He makes the world in that space – a world made expressly so he could create man and put him in it.

In a word, the world exists for man.

He creates man and gives him independent free will so he can work in partnership with God to co-create the world as it should be – filled with sharing and compassion.

There is a deeper thread in this explanation that says that the whole entirety of the universe was ‘supposed’ to happen in the Garden of Eden where events would play themselves out in 24 hours. Then the world would cease to be, being redundant, and man would dance in a timeless dance with God.

And the explanation says that Adam saw how things was supposed to go, but he wanted to live it all to the full. He wasn’t being rebellious, he wanted to show how he could do even better than what was asked of him.

So he ate the apple from the tree of the knowledge of good and evil so that he could crawl out from the bottom of the muck-heap of life and join God in the dance.

What did he think he was doing? What Adam did was to put himself on top. He went against the express commandment of God who had created him and decided to do it his way.

Still, I’d better not complain because I’m only here because of what he did…

And so the world goes on. And no-one wants it to end. Or as Hilly Blue, the character played by Divine in Trouble in Mind says,

Everyone wants to get to heaven, but not yet.

The explanation goes on to say that God will have his way and the world will end and the dance will start on time – and we will get there either kicking and screaming and with a lot of heartache – or more easily if we cooperate.

Well that’s the explanation. I respect it because it holds together. It may not be true but it has logic and it is complete. And that is more than can be said for some explanations of what everything is all about.

I know that some people accept the biblical explanation as true. They accept is as much as they believe that the number 39 bus stops outside their house.*

Therefore, one of the things that I learned from this is to appreciate that there are people walking around who have a sense of what the world is, what time is, where things are going, and why they are going there, and in fact that there is a ‘why’ at all.

Not everyone has those insights, of course.

And it has given me an inkling of the huge gulf that can exist between people who occupy the same planet but who simply do not live in the same mental universe as one another.

I have to ask, in the absence of this explanation what idea do I have of where things are going or where I am going?

If I am the growing tip of the universe, what will determine which way I go? What will determine how I will behave?


* The 39 bus is a reference to the film of The Spy Who Came In From The Cold and a conversation between Richard Burton and Claire Bloom. She asks him whether he believes in God and he answers that he believes the 39 bus stops outside the house and beyond that he does not know.

Your Toothbrush Will Know How Long You Brushed For

This is about when your toothbrush will know how long you brushed for, and why someone will make that happen.

Something I read last night made me think of the predictions made in a talk I heard. The talk was Design Outside The Box and it was given in 2010 by Carnegie Mellon University Professor, Jesse Schell.

The video of the talk was part of an online course in gamification that I took a couple of years ago.

If you are not familiar with gamification it is a way of encouraging people to a certain kind of behaviour by giving them the satisfaction that is typical in games – including rules, rewards, and competition.

The rewards can be extrinsic, such as money or discounts, or they can be intrinsic, such as medals or badges, or points.

Or they can be self-satisfaction giving, such as the pleasure of doing well in the game or in the activity around which the game is built. Competition can be against others or against oneself by doing better than one’s previous performance.

A child having to spend an hour playing the piano for an hour a day and getting a reward of an ice-cream can turn into a self-rewarding game when the child gets good enough that the experience of playing the piano and getting better at it becomes its own reward.

If the game is good, people will see it as having value and a character of its own and it will grow organically.

Jessie Schell is a great presenter – really exceptional – and if you want to watch the video of him talking about what I am about to describe, then here is the link to Jessie Schell’s talk.

He says (in 2010 when he gave the talk) – Game designers designed for fantasy, but the new movement in games is towards reality.

And we are primed and ready for reality and authenticity – we are cut off from nature and from self sufficiency – we want to get to anything that is real. We will take somewhat real or nearly real if it is presented as being more real. Put grass and a tree on a wrapper and say it’s natural, and we’ll take it: We are that desperate.

Sensors are what will bring the real world into games and games into the real world. And the key will be price and disposable technology.

Your toothpaste tube will contain a sensor with wifi connection that will detect how many times you squeezed it. Your toothbrush will know how long you brushed for and it will give you bonus points for brushing for the full recommended three minutes. And the points will get you discounts on your dental plan.

And the toothpaste company has provided you with an incentive to use more toothpaste.

Your bus card will know when you took the bus instead of the car and it will reward the help you give to the environment which will earn you points in the community leader board and lower your local taxes.

And your shoes will know when you walk to work and when you walk fast and that will give you points and if you walk every day for a week you will get bonus points and more discounts off your health plan.

Your cereal packet will have an interactive game on it and you will be able to play with your Facebook friends. And all the while you will be staring at the cereal packet and you will buy that cereal the next time because it has the game and because you started at the box for so long.

That was 2010, and on Google News this evening I read that

Insurance company Aetna today announced a major health initiative centered on the iPhone, iPad, and Apple Watch, which will see Aetna subsidizing the cost of the Apple Watch for both large employers and individual customers.

Well, that’s the commercial side of the equation. On the community side, Glasgow city council has been struggling for a while with how best arrange cycle paths through the city. Traffic is heavy, and the city was not built for cycling.

They realised it would be handy if they knew where cyclists actually cycled. And it turned out that that information was easy to get. Cyclists use apps that track their routes and their performance. So Glasgow negotiated a deal to get the anonymised information to help them plan their cycle paths.

Simple.

The Awful Story Of Fracking

This is a precis of a talk about fracking given by a Dr. Ingraffea, who is a professor in the School of Civil and Environmental Engineering at Cornell University in the US and an expert in fracking.

Here is the link to his bio at Cornell.

His Talk:
Deep fracking is done by drilling long laterals holes at great depth. The technology is fifteen years old and it is still being developed.

The sheer length of the piping necessitates that water is injected at very high pressure. Water resists being pumped, so chemicals (eight million gallons of chemicals in the case of some wells) are added to make the water flow more easily – this mix is the so-called slickwater.

Once the hole is drilled a cement case is built around it. The cement case around the piping prevents methane from escaping into the the surrounding rock and travelling wherever it will, rather than being extracted via the piping.

The cement is pumped in as a liquid, and if it doesn’t make good contact with the surrounding rock, then methane will escape.

Reasons why it might not make good contact are

    • The cement went in too dry
    • The cement wasn’t pushed down properly
    • Not enough cement was pumped in to reach above existing shallow shale deposits
    The centralisers that makes sure cement is put all around the pipe are not placed correctly or at all.

If centralisers – a series of ‘o’ rings that are placed over the pipes – are not placed correctly, then the pipe will not be central in the bore hole and there will not be any cement where it is needed to keep the methane from escaping into the surrounding rock.

The failure rate for inland fracking wells of this type, which are just a few years old – as determined by Schlumberger in one review and by Watson and Bauhu in another – is more than 6%.

The experience from offshore wells is that wells of all kinds have an increased failure rate as they get older – up to 60% for thirty-year-old wells.

The chemicals pumped in to make slickwater include hydrochoric acid,acetic acide, sodium chloride, polyacrylamide, ethylene glycol, borates, carbonates, glutaraldehyde, guar gum, citric acid, isopropanol, and ethylene glycol.


The Wikipedia page on polyacrylamide says:

Concerns have been raised that polyacrylamide used in agriculture may contaminate food with the nerve toxin acrylamide. While polyacrylamide itself is relatively non-toxic, it is known that commercially available polyacrylamide contains minute residual amounts of acrylamide remaining from its production, usually less than 0.05% w/w.